A quick update on the arbitration process and why decisions sometimes (like the Stores grievance) take a little longer than people expect.

Arbitration is often described as a faster alternative to traditional court litigation, and in many ways it is. But that doesn’t always mean decisions come immediately after the hearing. After the hearing, the parties have to wait for a transcript to be created, draft and submit briefs, and then patiently wait for the arbitrator to make their decision.

Arbitrators are typically practicing lawyers, former judges, or professionals who manage multiple matters at the same time. Once the parties submit their final briefs, the arbitrator still needs time to review the entire record, consider the legal arguments, evaluate the evidence, and prepare a written decision. A few practical factors can also affect timing. For example, if an arbitrator is widely respected in their field, they often have a very full schedule. In addition, timing around holidays or other scheduling constraints can slow the process a bit simply because there are fewer working days, family vacations, and competing obligations.

That’s largely what’s happening in the Stores arbitration. The parties selected a very popular (and busy) arbitrator. The final briefs were filed right before the holiday season, which meant the decision-writing period overlapped with an already crowded time of year. On top of that, the case itself involves a number of complex factual and contractual issues that require careful review. At this point, the matter is fully submitted and the parties are awaiting the arbitrator’s decision. As with most arbitrations, the goal is a thoughtful and well-reasoned award, even if that sometimes means the process takes a bit longer than expected.

We’ll share an update once the decision is issued.